logonew

PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University-Dimension Competent Needs Improvement

Dimension Competent Needs Improvement

PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500

Dimension Competent Needs Improvement Unacceptable Introduction

40%

The topic is clear and concisely responds to the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is appropriately ideas are outlined and implemented. Does not contain superfluous information.

40%

The approach is too broad or too narrow for the assigned/selected topic. The organization of the topic is difficult to follow and superficially implemented. Provides too much unnecessary information.

20%

Fails to present or respond to the assigned/selected topic. Organization of topic is missing, vague, or not consistently maintained.

0% Body of presentation

40%

All main points are well-developed; directly related to the topic. Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. There is a logical flow to the topics/arguments.

40%

Most main points are present, but not consistently pertinent to the thesis. Supporting examples are unclear or missing.

20%

The main points are poorly developed or not pertinent to the thesis. Missing supporting examples.

0% Conclusion

5%

The conclusion is clearly stated, and connections to the research and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit.

5%

The conclusion is unclear. Partially connected to the research. Significant errors in logic.

2.5%

The conclusion is unclear. Connections to research are incorrect/unclear, or just a repetition of the findings without explanation. Underlying logic has major flaws.

0% Research (literature review)

5%

The research selected is highly relevant to the topic, and is properly incorporated into the presentation. The evidence comes from a wide variety of valid sources; minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.

5%

Research is relevant to the topic, yet incomplete, vague, and/or is poorly incorporated into the body paragraphs. Unclear components. Some evidence does not come from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.

2.5%

The research selected is not relevant to the topic, and is not properly incorporated into the body paragraphs. The evidence seldom comes from valid sources: minimum “required” sources published within the last 5 years.

0% Writing/ Mechanics and Voice- over-PPT

Writing is clear and concise. Writing is fluid and free from spelling and grammatical errors. Terminology is clearly defined. Writing uses the appropriate voice (active/passive).

Writing often contains spelling and grammatical errors. Writing inconsistently switches voices (active/passive).

Slides are difficult to read – do not flow logically from one part to another. There are consistent spelling and/or grammatical errors; technical terms may not be defined or are poorly defined. Writing does not use appropriate voice

PPT presentation- Grading Rubric Miami Regional University- MSN5500

5%

Voice-over-PPT used -appropriate and well understood. APA formatting appropriate.

5%

Voice-over-PPT used – unclear and poor understood APA formatting appropriate.

2.5%

(active/passive). Voice-over-PPT not used. APA formatting inappropriate.

0%

References

5%

References are precisely listed in APA (6th Edition format). In-text citations are used correctly for all quotations and paraphrasing.

5%

References are listed in APA format with frequent errors. In-text citations are missing, or contain frequent errors.

2.5%

References are not listed in the correct APA format. In-text citations are missing. PLAGIARISM will be addressed as per MRU’s policy.

0%