logonew

Summarizes the health care economic issue

Lobbying for Change Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

Does not provide any type of summary of the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

Provides an unclear or incomplete summary of the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

Summarizes the health care economic issue that you are addressing.

Summarizes the health care economic issue that you are addressing. Notes how the issue is currently impacting the constituents of the elected official that the letter is addressed to.

Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

Does not describe positive and negative outcomes in general terms.

Describes positive and negative outcomes in general terms. The relevance to the issue and taking action to address the issue of these outcomes is unclear and lacking in detail.

Explains the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.

Explains the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed. Targets tone and content of the explanation to the elected official the letter is addressed to.

Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

Does not provide any kind of summary of key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

Provides an incomplete or unclear summary of key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

Summarizes key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.

Summarizes key information from at least five scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue, the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, or national level, and proposed changes or actions to address the issue. Notes social justice, structural racism, and inequity principles that were used when making the recommendations for the proposed changes.

Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

Does not list personal, professional, and organizational experiences that informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

Lists personal, professional, and organizational experiences that informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue, but there is a general lack of detail provided.

Explains how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.

Explains how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue. Relates a succinct story from experiences in personal health care practice to illustrate the planning and analysis approach taken.

Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and

Does not convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone or style. Clear, effective communication is inhibited by insufficient supporting evidence

Conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and

Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well- suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED scholarly writing standards.

writing scholarly standards.

or minimal adherence to applicable writing standards.

scholarly writing standards. Attempts to apply APA style and formatting.

Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.